loadmop.blogg.se

Filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow
Filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow





filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow
  1. Filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow install#
  2. Filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow full#
  3. Filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow code#

Especially relying on png.h pulling other stuff in implicitly is just silly. The way it is used "works for me" but is technically wrong and should be changed and I really don't see why it has to be that way. "" is supposed to search the -I path after searching locally without a result.

Filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow install#

Mai 2013 um 11:01 Uhrīetreff: Re: zint-2.4.3 patch to install on gentoo linux On the other hand most of Windows/VS users will not have a running cmake environment to generate these makefiles. There is not much to maintain with them and whoever uses them has to change options/switches manually in every case. I'd prefer to keep the Visual Studio project files. > $(CC) -Wall $(INCLUDE) $(CFLAGS) $(ZINT_VERSION) -I./backend > -L./backend main.o -o zint -lzint $(LIBS) > + $(CC) -Wall $(INCLUDE) $(CFLAGS) $(ZINT_VERSION) -I./backend > - $(CC) -Wall $(INCLUDE) $(CFLAGS) $(ZINT_VERSION) -I./backend > $(CC) -c -Wall $(INCLUDE) $(CFLAGS) $(ZINT_VERSION) -I./backend > #include "maxipng.h" /* Maxicode shapes */ > -#include "png.h" /* libpng header includes zlib.h and setjmp.h */ > be generated by cmake!) but I don't want to step on the current

filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow

> then move on to remove the Makefiles and MS© Visual Studio™ files (they can > I would take the liberty and just do the following *for the moment* and

filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow

> In any case, an ebuild would be nice, but requiring an epatch for these > We really have to get this under control IMHO. > Also: Is anyone using the microsoft compilers, and/or the vcproj file? > in the source? Which one is everyone using? I would prefer to remove the > Question: Why do we have handmade makefiles as well as working cmake files > Also I "just noticed" that we appear to have working cmake files. > All in all I am not surprised this has build errors for some people, In > the "zint" target omits required libraries. > There is also something wrong with the backend makefile, for some reason I suspect it originates from people who vc project file for building > Especially relying on png.h pulling other stuff in implicitly is just > should be changed and I really don't see why it has to be that way. The way it is used "works for me" but is technically wrong and > "" is supposed to search the -I path after searching locally without a > An: Betreff: Re: zint-2.4.3 patch to install on gentoo linux > environment to generate these makefiles. > On the other hand most of Windows/VS users will not have a running cmake > maintain with them and whoever uses them has to change options/switches > I'd prefer to keep the Visual Studio project files.

Filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow code#

Then so be it, I don't for see any conflicts keeping the code the same with if "png.h" works for Visual Studio projects Installed (as well as most *nix users in general) and my patch changes I have no objections to keeping both, gentoo users will all have cmake Why is nobody looking at the master branch? :/. > files (they can be generated by cmake!) but I don't want to step on > and then move on to remove the Makefiles and MS(c) Visual Studio(tm) > I would take the liberty and just do the following *for the moment* The makefiles for some reason, we can revert the change. I've removed the files to avoid confusion if someone wants to maintain IIRC, CMake can produce nmake makefiles, so probably even for those whoĪre in that kind of extreme masochism, the msvc project files are The GUI compiled fine tooīut segfaulted, due a bug in QT, apparently. I got it compiling fine with MinGW and CMake. Also: Is anyone using the microsoft compilers, > files in the source? Which one is everyone using? I would prefer to > Question: Why do we have handmade makefiles as well as working cmake > browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code.

Filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow full#

> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. > New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service > Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt > I was told sourceforge is the latest and am working there

filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow

> Betreff: Re: zint-2.4.3 patch to install on gentoo linux How could one find this project and mailing list on SF and then pull the sources from Github? :-o Exactly, Sourceforge IS the latest, and the one and only.







Filemaker pro 16 scanning barcodes slow